2026 ECNP Congress

PS03-3247

Clinical and health economic outcomes of an outcomes-based agreement to prevent relapse in schizophrenia

John Donoghue — A. Oxley, G. Shirley, K. Harrsen, M. Yildirim · Medicines in Mental Health Ltd, Real World Evidence, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Background

Relapse is common in schizophrenia and is associated with poor outcomes and the development of treatment resistance. The use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics has been shown to reduce relapse rates. This report summarises the results of an outcomes-based agreement between Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust and Lundbeck Ltd. that linked the acquisition cost of treatment to the achievement of a specific health outcome – relapse prevention.

Methods

Outcomes were evaluated in schizophrenia patients admitted to hospital with a psychotic episode (index admission) who were subsequently discharged on aripiprazole once-monthly long-acting injectable (AOM). Patients were allocated to three-monthly cohorts. The agreement specified that, for each cohort, the number of admissions in the 6 months post-discharge should be at least 30% lower than in the preceding 6 months, including the index admission. If the threshold was exceeded, the cost of treatment for the entire cohort for the subsequent 6 months would be reimbursed. Using a mirror-image design, the primary outcome was the number of admissions in the 6 months post-discharge compared with the number of admissions in the preceding 6 months. Secondary outcomes included bed occupancy and a range of economic measures with costs estimated for: i. bed occupancy; ii. the cost of AOM; iii. the cost of community visits for administration of AOM.

Outcomes

Over two years, in eight cohorts of varying size, a total of 95 patients entered the scheme. The total number of admissions including the index admission in the 6 months prior to discharge on AOM was 121. In the 6 months post-discharge, the total number of admissions was 19, a reduction of 84.2%. The threshold for breaching the agreement was not met for any cohort.

The total number of bed days occupied before discharge on AOM was 10,694, with a mean length of hospital stay in the index admission of 99.7 days. In the 6 months post-discharge, the total number of bed days occupied was 2,137, with a mean length of stay of 112.5 days. The difference was 8,557 bed-days, equivalent to an increase in bed availability of 47 beds.

Post-discharge, 76 patients were not re-admitted and each received 6 doses of AOM with a total estimated cost of GBP 228,187 including community visits; 19 patients who were re-admitted received between them a total of 22 AOM doses at a total estimated cost of GBP 11,009 including community visits.

The total cost difference, pre- and post-discharge, including bed occupancy and the cost of AOM plus community visits was GBP 4.68 million, equivalent to a saving of GBP 49,275 per patient.

Conclusions

The outcomes-based agreement aligned with usual clinical practice and no outcomes data were required beyond those that were routinely collected. Relapse rates were reduced by nearly 85% with an estimated cost saving of GBP 4.68 million.

References

No references